Chevrolet U-VA Vs Hyundai i10
Posted on May 7th 2010Welcome back!

The need of these two cars can be in cities which are crowded and need quick access. They are zippy around corners and have best handling which means they are easy to maneuver.
| Chevrolet U-VA | Hyundai i10 | |
| Engine Type | In-Line Engine | In-Line Engine |
| Engine Description | 1.2L 76bhp SOHC | 1.2L 79bhp 4 cyl. In-line |
| Engine Displacement (cc) | 1150 | 1197 |
| No. of Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Maximum Power | 76 @ 5,500 (PS@rpm) | 80 @ 5,200 (PS@rpm) |
| Maximum Torque | 11.2 @ 4,400 (kgm@rpm) | 11.4 @ 4,000 (kgm@rpm) |
| Valves/Cylinder | 2 | 4 |
| Valve Configuration | SOHC | DOHC |
| Fuel Supply System | SEFI | MPFI |
| Bore x Stroke | 68.5 x 78 mm | 71 x 75.6 mm |
| Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Chevrolet Aveo U-VA for 1.2 LS | Hyundai i10 Asta | |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Gear box | 5 Speed | 5 Speed |
| Drive Type | FWD | NA |
| Suspension System | ||
| Front Suspension | McPherson Struts with Anti Torsion roll bars and Hydraulic shock absorbers |
McPherson Strut with Stabilizer Bar and “I” type sub frame |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Coupled Torsion Beam Axle with Coil Spring |
| Shock Absorbers Type | Gas Filled | NA |
| Steering | ||
| Steering Type | Power | Power |
| Steering Column | Tilt | Tilt |
| Steering Gear Type | Rack & Pinion | Rack & Pinion |
| Turning Radius (wheel base) | 4.95 m | NA |
| Brake System | ||
| Front Brake Type | Ventilated Disc | Ventilated Disc |
| Rear Brake Type | Self-Adjusting Drum | Drum |
| Performance | ||
| Top Speed | 155 kmph | NA |
| Acceleration (0-100 kmph) | 16.4 seconds | NA |
| Fuel | ||
| Mileage-City (kmpl) | 11.9 | 15.4 |
| Mileage-Highway (kmpl) | 14.7 | 19.2 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Fuel Tank Capacity (liters) | 45 | 35 |
| Emission Norm Compliance | Bharat Stage III | Euro V |
| Tires | ||
| Tire Size | 155/80 R13 | 155/80 R 13 |
| Tire Type | Tubeless Radial | |
| Wheel Size | 13 x 5.0 J | |
| Other Specifications | ||
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
| No of Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Payload & Towing | ||
| Cargo Volume | 220 liters | NA |
The interiors are simply superb in the U-VA. The U-VA is spacious and offers superb comforts. If you want a family car which can be taken to office and for your personal needs the U-VA is the best option. The i10 on the other hand has bit too small space as compared to U-VA. The interiors are equipped with features and one of the best displays. Hyundai has designed the car according to new specifications. Since both of them have the capacity to accommodate 4 adults they are easy to drive.
Engine and mileage
The U-VA delivers an average of 12kmpl in city. The i10 on the other hand is great and economical. It delivers an average of 16kmpl in the city. The i10 is total value for money if economy is on your mind. The engine is quite reliable and has best output. If you wish to take these cars out on the highway they perform superb and have best output ever. The design of engine is does according to new specifications which has new emission norms.
Handling quality
The i10 is small and zippy. If you wish to take it out for a spin in the evening this is the best car. Handling the i10 is simply superb and comfortable. The driver’s position and steering alignment is perfect. The U-VA on the other hand is bit difficult to handle. Being oversized hatchback it is difficult to control but the engine response is perfect and according to new specifications.
Time to go to the ATM
The U-VA has made it but unfortunately it cannot cut the cake. The i10 is perfect hatchback which is light weighted and zippy. If you are looking for a car which is small and can help carrying your world with you this is the best option. It is a total value for money.
By editor in Auto India News, Auto Industry News, Chevrolet, Hyundai, Indian Car Comparisons
Buy Facebook Fans responded on 01 Nov 2011 at 9:53 am #
Super Website
[…] that is the end of this article. Here you’ll find some sites that we think you’ll appreciate, just click the links over[…]