Chevrolet Aveo Vs Hyundai Verna
Posted on May 18th 2010Welcome back!
The interiors of the Verna are not that great. You have the features, but the Verna lacks in leg room. The need of a super car is here which can take your family all the destinations you desire.
| Chevrolet Aveo | Hyundai Verna | |
| Engine | ||
| Engine Type | In-Line Engine | In-Line Engine |
| Engine Description | 1.4L 94bhp DOHC | 1.5L 110bhp CRDi with VGT |
| Engine Displacement (cc) | 1399 | 1493 |
| No. of Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Maximum Power | 94 @ 6,200 (PS@rpm) | 110 @ 4,000 (PS@rpm) |
| Maximum Torque | 12.9 @ 3,500 (kgm@rpm) | 24 @ 1,900-2,750 (kgm@rpm) |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 | 4 |
| Valve Configuration | DOHC | DOHC |
| Fuel Supply System | SEFI | CRDI |
| Bore x Stroke | 77.9 x 73.4 mm | 75 x 87 mm |
| Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 17.8:1 |
| Turbo Charger | No | No |
| Super Charger | No | No |
| Transmission | ||
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Gear box | 5 Speed | 5 Speed |
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Overdrive | Yes | NA |
| Clutch Type | Single, Dry Plate Clutch | NA |
| Suspension System | ||
| Front Suspension | McPherson Struts | McPherson Strut with coil springs and anti-roll bar |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Coupled torsion beam axle |
| Shock Absorbers Type | Gas Filled | Gas Filled |
| Steering | ||
| Steering Type | Power | Power |
| Steering Column | Tilt | Tilt |
| Steering Gear Type | Rack & Pinion | Rack & Pinion |
| Turning Radius (wheel base) | 5.03 m | 5.05 m |
| Brake System | ||
| Front Brake Type | Ventilated Disc | Ventilated Disc |
| Rear Brake Type | Self-Adjusting Drum | Disc & Drum |
| Performance | ||
| Top Speed | 170 kmph | 185 kmph |
| Acceleration (0-100 kmph) | 13.4 seconds | 11.2 seconds |
| Fuel | ||
| Mileage-City (kmpl) | 10.8 | 12.6 |
| Mileage-Highway (kmpl) | 14.0 | 16.8 |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Diesel |
| Fuel Tank Capacity (liters) | 45 | 45 |
| Emission Norm Compliance | Bharat Stage III | NA |
| Emission Control System | Catalytic Converter | NA |
| Tires | ||
| Tire Size | 185/60 R 14 | 175/70 R14 |
| Tire Type | Tubeless Radial Tire | Tubeless Radial Tire |
| Wheel Size | 14 x 5.5 J | 14 x 5.0J |
| Alloy Wheel Size | 14 inches | NA |
| Other Specifications | ||
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
| No of Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Payload & Towing | ||
| Cargo Volume | 400 liters | 352 liters |
| Car Details | ||
| Country of Assembly | India | India |
| Country of Manufacture | India | India |
| Discontinuation Date | 1/1/2025 | 1/1/2025 |
| Introduction Date | 7/1/2009 | 29-Sep-06 |
| Warranty Time | 3 years | NA |
| Warranty Distance | 45,000 kms | NA |
Both the cars have top notch interior features. The Aveo has more space when it comes to interiors. This is an added feature which is given with the Aveo. All you need to do is rejuvenate inside the investment which has wheels. The interiors of the Verna are equally superb but it lacks in space and area for you body parts.Handling and performance
Since the Verna is light weighted car it gains speed with ease. This is not the case with the Aveo. You might want to drag the car to reach top speeds. The Verna on the other hand reaches the three digit mark in less time. This is one of the best features of the Japanese manufacturer.Engine and feel
Both of them have the same engine which delivers equal output. You might want to be in the Aveo at the moment because the car is desperately pretty. It has a slow engine but it definitely has a good top end.
Time to go to the ATM
The Aveo is the perfect choice which has power and luxury. Well if you only need power the Verna is a better alternative.
By editor in Auto India News, Auto Industry News, Chevrolet, Hyundai, Indian Car Comparisons